Back to Blog
Security

The Hidden Risks of SMS: SS7 Vulnerabilities and Roaming Attacks

Explore the security vulnerabilities in SMS infrastructure and why businesses are moving to more secure messaging platforms.

Marcus Rodriguez
January 10, 2025
12 min read

The Hidden Risks of SMS: SS7 Vulnerabilities and Roaming Attacks


SMS has been the backbone of mobile communication for decades, but its underlying infrastructure harbors serious security vulnerabilities that most developers and businesses aren't aware of. In this deep dive, we'll explore the technical details of these vulnerabilities and why modern applications need better alternatives.


The SS7 Protocol: A Legacy Security Nightmare


Signaling System 7 (SS7) is the protocol suite that enables SMS, voice calls, and other telecommunications services. Developed in the 1970s, it was designed for a closed network of trusted telecom operators—not the interconnected, threat-rich environment we have today.


How SS7 Attacks Work


SS7 attacks exploit the trust model built into the telecommunications infrastructure:


1. **Network Access**: Attackers gain access to SS7 networks through:

- Compromised telecom operators

- Rogue SS7 gateways

- Purchased access from underground markets


2. **Location Tracking**: Using the `Send Routing Info` command:

```

MAP_SEND_ROUTING_INFO

IMSI: 310150123456789

MSISDN: +15551234567

```


3. **SMS Interception**: Redirecting messages through:

```

MAP_UPDATE_LOCATION

New MSC: attacker_controlled_msc

Target IMSI: 310150123456789

```


Real-World SS7 Attacks


Several high-profile attacks have demonstrated these vulnerabilities:


  • 2016: German O2-Telefonica customers had their bank accounts drained via SMS interception
  • 2017: Researchers demonstrated live SMS interception at security conferences
  • 2019: WhatsApp confirmed SS7 attacks were used to intercept verification codes

  • SIM Swapping: The Social Engineering Vector


    SIM swapping attacks bypass technical security by exploiting human vulnerabilities:


    The Attack Process


    1. **Information Gathering**: Attackers collect personal information through:

    - Social media reconnaissance

    - Data breaches

    - Phishing campaigns


    2. **Social Engineering**: Calling the victim's mobile carrier:

    ```

    Attacker: "Hi, I lost my phone and need to transfer my number

    to a new SIM card. My name is [victim's name]..."

    ```


    3. **Account Takeover**: Once the number is transferred:

    - SMS-based 2FA is compromised

    - Password reset codes are intercepted

    - Financial accounts are accessed


    SIM Swapping Statistics


  • $68 million: Stolen through SIM swapping in 2021 (FBI report)
  • 2,658 complaints: Filed with FBI in 2021, up from 320 in 2018
  • Average loss: $25,000 per victim

  • SMS Roaming Vulnerabilities


    International roaming introduces additional attack vectors:


    Roaming Attack Scenarios


    1. **IMSI Catchers**: Fake cell towers that:

    - Intercept SMS messages

    - Perform man-in-the-middle attacks

    - Downgrade encryption


    2. **Malicious Roaming Partners**: Compromised operators can:

    - Access subscriber data

    - Intercept communications

    - Perform location tracking


    Technical Details


    When roaming, SMS messages traverse multiple networks:


    User Device → Visited Network → Home Network → Destination

    ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑

    Vulnerable Vulnerable Vulnerable Vulnerable


    Each hop introduces potential interception points.


    The Business Impact


    Financial Losses


    SMS vulnerabilities lead to significant business costs:


  • Direct fraud: $10.5 billion lost to SMS-based fraud in 2021
  • Regulatory fines: GDPR fines up to 4% of annual revenue
  • Reputation damage: Average 7.5% stock price drop after security breaches

  • Compliance Risks


    Regulations increasingly require secure communication:


  • PCI DSS: Requires secure transmission of cardholder data
  • HIPAA: Mandates protection of health information
  • SOX: Requires secure financial communications

  • Case Study: Banking SMS Vulnerabilities


    The Attack


    In 2020, a major European bank experienced a sophisticated attack:


    1. **Reconnaissance**: Attackers identified high-value targets

    2. **SS7 Exploitation**: Used SS7 access to intercept SMS codes

    3. **Account Takeover**: Gained access to 847 customer accounts

    4. **Financial Theft**: Transferred €2.3 million before detection


    The Response


    The bank's response included:

  • Immediate SMS 2FA suspension
  • Migration to app-based authentication
  • Customer notification and compensation
  • Regulatory reporting and fines

  • Technical Mitigations


    Network-Level Protections


    Telecom operators can implement:


    SS7 Firewall Rules

    BLOCK MAP_SEND_ROUTING_INFO FROM untrusted_networks

    BLOCK MAP_UPDATE_LOCATION FROM foreign_operators

    RATE_LIMIT SMS_DELIVERY_REPORT_REQUEST


    Application-Level Solutions


    Developers should implement:


    1. **Multi-Factor Authentication**:

    ```javascript

    // Don't rely solely on SMS

    const authMethods = [

    'sms_otp', // Fallback only

    'app_push', // Primary

    'hardware_key', // Enterprise

    'biometric' // Mobile

    ];

    ```


    2. **Risk-Based Authentication**:

    ```javascript

    function assessRisk(user, context) {

    const riskFactors = {

    newDevice: context.deviceFingerprint.isNew,

    unusualLocation: context.geoLocation.isUnusual,

    roamingNetwork: context.network.isRoaming,

    vpnUsage: context.network.isVPN

    };


    return calculateRiskScore(riskFactors);

    }

    ```


    The Inbox Solution


    Inbox addresses SMS vulnerabilities through:


    End-to-End Encryption


    All messages are encrypted using Signal Protocol:


    // Message encryption flow

    const message = {

    to: '+15551234567',

    type: 'otp',

    body: { code: '123456' }

    };


    const encryptedMessage = await signalProtocol.encrypt(

    message,

    recipientPublicKey

    );


    Verified Senders


    Only verified businesses can send messages:


    1. **Domain Verification**: DNS TXT record validation

    2. **Business Verification**: Legal entity confirmation

    3. **Code Review**: Application security assessment


    Network Isolation


    Messages never traverse traditional SMS networks:


    App → Inbox API → Encrypted Channel → Inbox App

    ↑ ↑

    Secure Secure


    Migration Strategy


    Phase 1: Assessment

  • Audit current SMS usage
  • Identify high-risk scenarios
  • Calculate potential impact

  • Phase 2: Pilot

  • Implement Inbox for OTP delivery
  • Monitor delivery rates and user experience
  • Gather security metrics

  • Phase 3: Full Migration

  • Replace all SMS-based 2FA
  • Implement rich message types
  • Decommission SMS infrastructure

  • Conclusion


    SMS vulnerabilities are not theoretical—they're actively exploited by attackers worldwide. The combination of SS7 protocol weaknesses, SIM swapping attacks, and roaming vulnerabilities creates an unacceptable risk for modern applications.


    Businesses that continue to rely on SMS for security-critical communications are:

  • Exposing customers to financial fraud
  • Violating regulatory requirements
  • Creating liability for security breaches

  • The solution is to migrate to modern, secure messaging platforms like Inbox that provide:

  • End-to-end encryption
  • Verified sender authentication
  • Network isolation from legacy vulnerabilities

  • Resources


  • [NIST Guidelines on SMS-based Authentication](https://pages.nist.gov/800-63-3/sp800-63b.html#sec5)
  • [SS7 Security Assessment Tools](https://github.com/P1sec/SigPloit)
  • [Inbox Security Whitepaper](/security-whitepaper.pdf)
  • [Migration Planning Template](/migration-template.pdf)